My question involves traffic court in the State of: Washington (Adams County, Judge Adalia A Hille)
I received a citation for speeding on January 12th, mailed in my papers within the 15 day time period, and have just received my notice of hearing. My Pre-Hearing is set for 3/17--this is 64 days after my infraction, which goes against IRLJ 2.6 (a)(1)(i) (thanks Barry!)
I think I should go forward with a motion for a speedy trail, because it seems likely they will be unable to schedule a speedy trial. I know from speaking with the court clerk before that they only have one court date a month, and only one judge in the district. I assume I'm on for March because their February date was too soon or full. My trail would need to be scheduled prior to 2/26 and if the 14 day notice still applies in this case I'd need notice of my new date by 2/12.
So my questions
1)Is my reasoning sound, should I go forward with the motion? (I found this example of the motion!)
2)If they can't provide a new date is the dismissal of my case ensured? Or is it still under the discretion of the judge? (2)(f) implies that to me, but I wasn't sure.
I received a citation for speeding on January 12th, mailed in my papers within the 15 day time period, and have just received my notice of hearing. My Pre-Hearing is set for 3/17--this is 64 days after my infraction, which goes against IRLJ 2.6 (a)(1)(i) (thanks Barry!)
I think I should go forward with a motion for a speedy trail, because it seems likely they will be unable to schedule a speedy trial. I know from speaking with the court clerk before that they only have one court date a month, and only one judge in the district. I assume I'm on for March because their February date was too soon or full. My trail would need to be scheduled prior to 2/26 and if the 14 day notice still applies in this case I'd need notice of my new date by 2/12.
So my questions
1)Is my reasoning sound, should I go forward with the motion? (I found this example of the motion!)
2)If they can't provide a new date is the dismissal of my case ensured? Or is it still under the discretion of the judge? (2)(f) implies that to me, but I wasn't sure.
Motions: Assistance on Motion for a Speedy Hearing Date
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire