My question involves civil rights in the State of California. Under article 1 section 25 of the state constitution it states that the people have the right to fish on public land unless used as a fish hatchery. Murdock v Pennsylvania says that a state can't charge a flat license fee for right under the constitution And shuttlsworth v the city of Birmingham says that if they do you have a right to ignore. Do you thing that this would stand in court?
Hindrance of Civil Rights: License to Fish in California
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire