My question relates to legal practice in the state of: CT
Please forgive me if this is the wrong forum!!
The short question is whether someone who is not named in a lawsuit, but who has been sent the legal papers in an ongoing lawsuit, including correspondence between opposing lawyers, has a duty or obligation to raise an error seen in a lawyer's letter?
Basic facts:
Minority shareholder is suing a company. It is agreed that correspondence between lawyers and legal papers to date are sent to all remaining shareholders. One such shareholder reads a sentence in a letter suggesting that between two specified dates, no one else had made any comment about a situation where in fact this shareholder had done so repeatedly.
Should this shareholder, who is not part of the lawsuit, raise an objection to this sentence in the lawyer's letter?
Please forgive me if this is the wrong forum!!
The short question is whether someone who is not named in a lawsuit, but who has been sent the legal papers in an ongoing lawsuit, including correspondence between opposing lawyers, has a duty or obligation to raise an error seen in a lawyer's letter?
Basic facts:
Minority shareholder is suing a company. It is agreed that correspondence between lawyers and legal papers to date are sent to all remaining shareholders. One such shareholder reads a sentence in a letter suggesting that between two specified dates, no one else had made any comment about a situation where in fact this shareholder had done so repeatedly.
Should this shareholder, who is not part of the lawsuit, raise an objection to this sentence in the lawyer's letter?
Legal Research: Should an Error in Legal Letter Be Corrected
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire