Boundary Agreements: In-Concise Verbiage Regarding the Ingress / Egress Easement

mercredi 29 octobre 2014

My question(s) involves real estate located in the State of: Missouri



Can vague working regarding ingress/egress easement allow the dominant party do as they please or allow the servient party to restrict the dominant party from doing anything other than using the easement as an ingress/easement?



Can the dominant party, or there relations, build a fence at the North property line?



Also, if there are not any parties spelled out on the easement how does one define the dominant party?



Verbiage from deed:





Sketch from deed:



(North is up)





The field road (shown in the image above) does not even appear to exist at this time.





Boundary Agreements: In-Concise Verbiage Regarding the Ingress / Egress Easement

0 commentaires:

Enregistrer un commentaire